A Conversation With “Big Red”


A Conversation With “Big Red”

Big Red”, for lack of a better name, has gone somewhat viral after CAFÉ’s last event at the University of Toronto campus.  She chose to shout out her perspectives of the Men’s Human Rights Movement (MHRM) rather than try to have a discussion about it.  When anyone tried to interject, men and women, they were screamed at to “shut the fuck up!”  I certainly wasn’t going to engage with someone like that, as I’ve done with protesters at past events, but here is a response to each of her 14 points.  She claimed it was her list, but it was actually from Lindy West’s article over at Jezebel.  Feel free to read the numbered portions in “Big Red’s” therapeutic voice:


1.    Feminists do not want you to lose custody of your children. The assumption that women are naturally better caregivers is part of patriarchy.

Well this is an easy one.  When discussing custody of children, obviously we are discussing parenting after a divorce.  If patriarchy feels women are not capable people, and seeks to oppress them, as feminists believe, then why would the patriarchy give children to women to be raised, and not to men?

In gatherer-hunter days, the women took care of the children while the men did the hunting.  Women were not seen as better care givers because of patriarchy, they were seen as better care givers because they were the ones who bore the children for nine months.  Long before safe sex, women would have had less control over when they got pregnant.  While pregnant, they would obviously not have been suited to long treks by foot to hunt dangerous game.  The fact that this is why men had to take on the dangerous role could also be argued to be a result of the matriarchy.

In more recent times, it was the view that men were better suited to raise the children after a divorce.  However, the tender years doctrine came as a result of a push by early feminists, who advocated to have the courts place children under the age of 13 in the custody of the mother.  It was women and feminists who pushed to have it acknowledged that women were to be considered the better care-givers for children.  As such, you could again argue that it was a matriarchy that has caused many fathers to be estranged from their children.


2.    Feminists do not like commercials in which bumbling dads mess up the laundry and competent wives have to bustle in and fix it. The assumption that women are naturally better housekeepers is part of patriarchy.

So men insult themselves by making ads showing men to be incompetent, only to be shown how to do things by women?  What is your argument for how this is a show of men benefitting from the oppression of women?

What about ads in which men are physically hurt by their partners?  For example, this Pepsi commercial that aired during the 2011 Superbowl (something you would likely argue is a quintessential example of the patriarchy), shows a woman abusing a man physically, controlling what he eats and drinks, emotionally damaging him to the point that he has to hide from her in fear just to eat a hamburger.  Only when a woman is assaulted at the end of the commercial, by the wife, is any concern shown for the victim of her abuse.


3.    Feminists do not want you to have to make alimony payments. Alimony is set up to combat the fact that women have been historically expected to prioritize domestic duties over professional goals, thus minimizing their earning potential if their “traditional” marriages end. The assumption that wives should make babies instead of money is part of patriarchy.

This falls into the same gatherer-hunter history I referenced earlier.  It was not the omnipotent patriarchy you speak of that lead to “traditional” relationships; it was the social evolution of our species.  If you think alimony is to counter the traditional notion of women staying home to make babies, perhaps alimony should be eliminated if there are no children in the picture.  If there were no children that required caring for, could a wife (or husband) not have been working?  If they were being supported, and didn’t have the responsibility of raising children, then they would have had plenty of opportunity to further themselves as you say raising babies is the alternative option to making money.


4.    Feminists do not want anyone to get raped in prison. Permissiveness and jokes about prison rape are part of rape culture, which is part of patriarchy.

Patriarchal views are about protection.  Being against rape culture is more in line with a patriarchal mentality.  Although “men can stop rape” is, at its roots, a feminist movement, it is more patriarchal than the notion that our culture is pro-rape.  Rape is a much more complicated topic than you make it out to be.  It is not a by-product of patriarchal culture.

While on the subject, the notion that “men can stop rape” is insulting to men who are victims of rape.  How do you think a man feels when he has been raped while living in a society that pushes the message that “men can stop rape”?  If so, why didn’t he stop it?  It is bad enough for men who are made to feel like they are pre-destined rapists, but it is much worse for one who has been raped himself.


5.    Feminists do not want anyone to be falsely accused of rape. False rape accusations discredit rape victims, which reinforces rape culture, which is part of patriarchy.

Feminists have said many things about false rape accusations.  Some have claimed that there is no such thing as false rape accusations, and feminist perspectives of male-as-perpetrator / female-as-victim silences men from speaking out about rape they have suffered.  Men, who have been taught that they cannot be raped, feel their accusation is false before it passes their lips.  Feminist driven rape-culture silences male victims of rape.

The second part, even if it just a repeat of your last point, ignores the great harm that false rape accusations inflict upon the wrongfully accused.  I don’t disagree that false rape accusations undermine the credibility of those who have been raped.  However, here you are, at an event to discuss issues facing men, and you are again ignoring men.  False rape accusations don’t just undermine true rape victims; they grievously harm those who have been falsely accused.

Wanetta Gibson’s false accusation caused a high school student to lose 5 years of his life, which had deep ramifications for his future (going to university, sports scholarships, etc.).  It also cost the school board $750 000, which having to return was her biggest concern after admitting she had made a false accusation. It was Brian Banks who suffered; not future victims of rape.

Luke Harwood was brutally tortured and murdered by a woman and a couple of friends after another friend of hers falsely said that he had raped her.  Do you see why it is insulting for you to focus on how false accusations hurt and discredit rape victims and ignore the victimization of those falsely accused?


6.    Feminists do not want you to be lonely and we do not hate “nice guys.” The idea that certain people are inherently more valuable than other people because of superficial physical attributes is part of patriarchy.

Nice guys are not nice because of superficial physical attributes.  Those were your words, not the patriarchy.  You may also want to consider the difference between the view of women for their physical attractiveness, and men for their physical usefulness.  As Warren Farrell wrote, women are often judged as sex objects while men are judged as success objects.  When men try to speak about their feelings and start discussing issues that men face, we run into the kind of demonstration you put on.


7.   Feminists do not want you to have to pay for dinner. We want the opportunity to achieve financial success on par with men in any field we choose (and are qualified for), and the fact that we currently don’t is part of patriarchy. The idea that men should coddle and provide for women, and/or purchase their affections in romantic contexts, is condescending and damaging and part of patriarchy.

How do you define financial success?  Above I mentioned men being viewed as success objects; men are judged by the size of their wallet.  Is this how you want to be judged, by the standard at which men are judged?  If so, are you comparing your image of achieving financial success on par with men based on the most successful or the least successful men?  Everyone wants to achieve success in their field, even if they choose the route of a stay-at-home parent.  However, there are many variables to life that do not simply mean you are going to achieve it by trying.  This is not a part of patriarchy; this is a part of life.

I will, however, cease to spend money on romantic and/or affectionate things.  I apologize to anyone I’ve been unintentionally condescending to in my past, and to any whom I have damaged by purchasing a gift to better express my affection.


8.    Feminists do not want you to be maimed or killed in industrial accidents, or toil in coal mines while we do cushy secretarial work and various yarn-themed activities. The fact that women have long been shut out of dangerous industrial jobs (by men, by the way) is part of patriarchy.

The biggest icon for women doing factory work was Rosie The Riveter.  Few feminists who look up to Rosie stop to think that she, and the many other women working factory jobs during World War 2, were manufacturing the munitions and war supplies ultimately used to kill men around the world.  Men didn’t leave those jobs, where they were already at-risk due to dangerous and unsafe work conditions, to go and place themselves in an even more precarious situation overseas.  They were forced to leave because of conscription.

Men work dangerous jobs to support families (women and children); Women take over men’s jobs while helping make the means to have them killed even more efficiently.  This is patriarchy oppressing women?

As for Rosie The Riveter, she only lasted two weeks at her job because she was concerned she might hurt her hands and be unable to play the cello.  “We can do it” indeed!

I could speak on this topic ad nauseam, (coal miners, chimney sweeps, firefighters, etc.) but I will leave it here.  However, this still ties into the social evolution that came out of our gatherer-hunter days in which men were better suited to do the hunting and women were better suited to do the child rearing and gathering.


9.    Feminists do not want you to commit suicide. Any pressures and expectations that lower the quality of life of any gender are part of patriarchy. The fact that depression is characterized as an effeminate weakness, making men less likely to seek treatment, is part of patriarchy.

When asked about male suicide at the event, you started singing “Cry Me a River”, so your supposed sympathy (although technically it is Lindy West’s) was insincere.  To claim that any, ANY pressures and expectations that lower the quality of life of any gender are part of the patriarchy, shows just how much there is a need for a critical understanding of feminism and what certain feminists are claiming.  That sentence alone discredits anything and everything anyone who agrees with it says.  If it does harm, it MUST be because of the patriarchy.  This is why it is pointless to try and address the concept of the patriarchy with a feminist who agrees with this sentiment.

Thank you for showing us how deep the rabbit hole goes.


10. Feminists do not want you to be viewed with suspicion when you take your child to the park (men frequently insist that this is a serious issue, so I will take them at their word). The assumption that men are insatiable sexual animals, combined with the idea that it’s unnatural for men to care for children, is part of patriarchy.

It is not just your kid, it is any kid.  If you are male, you are instantly viewed as a potential sex-offender.  Worse still, as you mentioned, this happens even when it is your own child.  The mayor of London, England, himself was asked to switch seats when he was on a flight with his own children.  Men are so vilified and untrustworthy in the public’s perception of them, that a man can’t even travel with his own kids without having to worry about being harassed and labelled as a sex offender.

For more on sexist airline policies:  http://www.forbes.com/sites/joshuagans/2012/08/14/who-can-sit-next-to-children-on-flights/


11. Feminists do not want you to be drafted and then die in a war while we stay home and iron stuff. The idea that women are too weak to fight, or too delicate to function in a military setting, is part of patriarchy.

I have not seen anyone claim that feminists want this.  However, while I do see some women advocating for the right to join the military, I do not see any demanding to have to register for the draft in the U.S.A.  Furthermore, I do not see any fighting for the abolishment of the registry in order to find some equality of treatment among the sexes within the American military.  You say you’re working on all this stuff, and we don’t need to worry, so could you please show me where you are doing this?

I will again remind you of Rosie the Riveter, and how she is a feminist icon who represented a large benefit for women thanks to the discrimination against men in this regard.


12. Feminists do not want women to escape prosecution on legitimate domestic violence charges, nor do we want men to be ridiculed for being raped or abused. The idea that women are naturally gentle and compliant and that victimhood is inherently feminine is part of patriarchy.

No, victimhood has no gender.  I would argue that it is not victimhood being inherently feminine that is part of patriarchy, it is resilience.  The survivor movements (e.g. psychiatric survivor) are ones of resilience and strength after one has been victimized.  That would be a closer resemblance of a patriarchal approach to me.


13. Feminists hate patriarchy. We do not hate you.

The MHRM do not hate you either, but we disagree with the feminists’ approach to certain topics, specifically the omnipotent and omnipresent patriarchy and all the evil that comes along with it.  You said that “any pressures and expectations that lower the quality of life of any gender are part of patriarchy.”  I couldn’t disagree more.

Feminism does not have a right to be free from criticism.  Neither does the MHRM.  We welcome your right to protest, but don’t infringe on our right to discuss how we see things from our perspective.  If you want to discuss these things, then feel free to do so, but please allow us the same right.


14. If you really care about those issues as passionately as you say you do, you should be thanking feminists, because feminism is a social movement actively dedicated to dismantling every single one of them. The fact that you blame feminists—your allies—for problems against which they have been struggling for decades suggests that supporting men isn’t nearly as important to you as resenting women. We care about your problems a lot. Could you try caring about ours?

Feminism often ignores men’s problems by making the problem a gendered issue in which the problems belong to women and their causes belong to men.  You may not hate men, but feminist language and perspectives don’t paint it that way for many of us.  Rather than telling us to “shut the fuck up”, you should try listening to our perspectives.  You learn nothing by listening to yourself speak.

Would you not like men to be able to get in touch with their emotions better?  Then don’t criticize us when we express our emotions and speak about how we feel when it comes to our sex.  I thought that was one of the things feminism was trying to combat.  If you, as you claim, are our allies, then don’t attack us for our criticisms.  Hear what we have to say and see if there isn’t some validity behind it.  We care about your problems too, but don’t counter our discussion of men’s problems by superseding them with women’s problems.  That is just being combative, and it isn’t helping anyone.

 “It is not just the right of the person who speaks to be heard, it is the right of everyone in the audience to listen and to hear; and every time you silence somebody, you make yourself a prisoner of your own action. You deny yourself the right to hear something. In other words your own right to hear and be exposed is as much involved in all these cases as the right of the other to voice his or her view.”

-Christopher Hitchens.

This entry was posted in Men`s Issues and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to A Conversation With “Big Red”

  1. Pingback: A Conversation With “Big Red” | Reyeko MRA

  2. femdelusion says:

    Very patient list. Nicely done. I just blockquoted the lot and said it was unlikely to be convincing! I especially like the fact you’re drawing attention to the way topics are needlessly genderised in the first place. If IPV is typically reciprocal, and female-on-male vs male-on-female prevalence is near-identical, what purpose is served by conceptualising it as gendered? These are extremely good questions, IMO.

    • eyeofwoden says:

      To say nothing of male-on-male and female-on-female. I work in the LGBT community, and these are also overlooked due to the societal male-as-perpetrator / female-as-victim binary.

      • femdelusion says:

        Is that pretty similar for gay people and lesbian people, out of interest? I genuinely just don’t have a clue (my heteronormativity is showing here, which I realise isn’t great).

      • eyeofwoden says:

        Yes, 10% of gay men (vs 7% of straight men) suffer IPV from last count I heard. One of the things I brought up since high school, was that if men are more likely to be abusers, aren’t gay men more likely to suffer IPV? And if women are more likely to be abused, then aren’t lesbian women more likely to suffer IPV?

        Male-as-perpetrator “rape culture” paints gay men’s violence as mutual battery (false), and lesbian relationships as a violence free utopia (also false). The same dynamics also exist as within heterosexual relationships. The “butch” in a lesbian relationship isn’t always the abusive partner, nor is the dominant male in a gay relationship.

  3. Titfortat says:

    And if women are more likely to be abused, then aren’t lesbian women more likely to suffer IPV?(Eye)

    Not if men are supposed to be the abuser. Lesbian women would show almost no signs of abuse then, right? But we all know that isnt true, I hope. 😉

    • eyeofwoden says:

      The same rationale could be taken for gay men, that if men are the abusers and not the abused, then gay men should not be abused in their relationships. On the contrary though, they have a higher rate of IPV (approximately 10% to the 7% rate for heterosexual men). This is normally summed up as mutual violence between partners.

      The same argument for lesbian women could be made that if they are the abused and not the abusers, then they shouldn’t be committing abuse at all. However, IPV does happen among lesbians as well (I don’t have percentages, but I would assume about 10% as well). For the victim perspective of women in IPV, this should be painted as mutual victimization to the male’s mutual battery.

      When one looks at the high rate of reciprocal violence in heterosexual IPV, and sees that this happens in gay and lesbian relationships as well, we should see that it is incorrect to talk about men as abusers and women as victims. We should be discussing IPV from the perspectives that sometimes people are violent towards their partners.

  4. Susan Longley says:

    Feminist sympathisers claim this is the same woman who received over 500 rape or death threats from angry MHRA’s. ( I have yet seen any evidence for such claims!) Feminists are always making claims of online harassment. Recent news from University of Wyoming shows how one campus feminist activist (see campus paper Branding Iron) brought shame and criminal charges about by posting threats of rape against herself on a campus facebook site. This was done all in the zealous efforts to promote and prove that a campus “rape culture” exists. Does this incident present any lessons for the University of Toronto campus?

    • eyeofwoden says:

      The only article I’ve read which discusses the threats she received pointed to comments made on a youtube video of her. Almost everyone who uses the internet (the majority of the world) has received some form of threat of physical harm in this manner. As someone who plays videogames, I have received far more than 500, but I sure don’t take them seriously. Offensive, sure, serious threats, not so much. To equate any threat of assault or rape unto a woman as being from the MHRM is a great error in judgement. Is every woman who advocates violence to men or telling men to know their place (buying dinner, opening doors, dying for their country, etc.) a feminist? No.

      I am unaware of the Wyoming case. From what I just briefly read (a woman posted rape threats towards herself to bring awareness to what a problem it is… *facepalm*), I do not think it is a lesson for the UofT campus, but rather a lesson to all that not everything should be taken at face value. An online rape threat does not indicate someone is from the MHRM and, in fact, they could very well identify as a feminist.

  5. Just saying says:

    Haven’t managed to wade my way through all the points yet but thought I’d add in a piece that seems to be consistently overlooked (and I haven’t seen it in the comments so far). (And, btw, I’m frankly getting soooo tired of what’s starting to feel like a ‘I’m a bigger victim than you are’ debate between MRAs and WRAs, that takes us completely off track of the issue of violence, which has taken us off track of just figuring out how to be healthy decent human beings that support and love one another in the first place.)

    As we all know by now – or should – females commit violence with depressing frequency. Including sexual abuse, and including pedophilia. But because we’ve genderized the discussion where we shouldn’t be viewing it through the lens of gender at all, it’s skewing our considerations and arguments. I see the false assumption made time after time after time, that we’re talking male on female, vs. female on male, heterosexual violence. And every once in a while someone steps up and asks ‘what about male on male, or female on female violence?’ Or trans, or bi, etc… But it’s always viewed as a LGBT issue.

    We always seem to forget that women and men commit abuse against children. Often against children of the same sex – NOT because they are homosexual but because they have easier access. I’ve seen more than a few studies on female pedophilia which shows that the most common victims of female pedophiles are their daughters. Straight or gay has nothing to do with it. Because that was my experience (maternal perpetrated violent SA), I recognize that thats a category that almost never gets mentioned. And that’s just my experience; I’m sure there are all kinds of other situations we haven’t considered. Like psychopaths (both male and female) who tend to be indiscriminate in their sexuality/exploitation (for psychopaths that’s the same thing) and who are truly equal opportunity predators.

    We really would do all victims a favour by stepping away from the ‘which gender is which’ lens. Otherwise we go down a rabbit-hole of ‘oh, we forgot yet another ‘gender vs. gender’ category’, and never get round to talking about the real issues, such as what makes people do these kinds of things, and what we can do about it..

    • eyeofwoden says:

      That’s the first time I’ve seen someone use the acronym “WRA”. I thought I was being unique when I used it in the post I just did on the Toronto Star article for CAFE.

      Yeah, there’s a lot of points. No wonder she wanted to get through it all and not be interrupted, a conversation with me would have been a novel. I agree with you about people on both sides often trying to be the bigger victim. To me it is not about who is victimized more, it is the fact that many victims aren’t being recognized. When I talk about the CDC report that swept almost 1.3 million male rape victims under a rug (a rug which read “other sexual violence”), it’s not to say men are bigger victims. It is to highlight that it is a big problem for men and also requires addressing.

      If you’ve read my other stuff, you should know I’m vocal about LGBT issues as well, and I’m well aware of how hetero-normative (as well as male-as-abuser) that area is. I will likely be doing an article at some point on the small change I implemented at my work when I first got there.

      As for female pedophilia, some MRA’s talk about women doing it in numbers that exceed men, based on whatever study of the day they’ve looked at. It’s not something I’ve looked into myself, but how many men who abuse children are in positions of trust? Jerry Sandusky and numerous other coaches? Priests? Teachers? Men in positions of trust where we place our most vulnerable population, children. Now how many positions of trust do women hold with children? Nannies? Teachers? Babysitters? Toronto Blue Jays pitcher RA Dickey has written about how he was sexually abused numerous times by his female babysitter when he was a child. Women do it too, but men are far more scrutinized when placed in positions of trust, which is why women are actually more likely to be in positions of trust when it comes to children. It could well be a case of “most accidents happen in the home”, because you are most often in your home. It’s not sex vs sex to me, but if all your child’s caretakers are men, then they are more likely to be assaulted by men, and vice versa for women.

      I think a big part of MRA’s rising up are good men who either have been victimized in some way themselves (divorce court, violence, custody battles), or feel like they’ve been villified for something they never did or thought about doing. Despite what Big Red thinks, clearly they disagree that feminism has been working on their problems and would fix them for them if they would just shut the fuck up.

  6. SYABM says:

    11. Feminists also demanded that women be put in combat without having to meet the same physical standards as men.

    According to the Wikipedia article on US conscription, NOW and the ACLU’s Women’s Division did in fact support an egalitarian draft back in the early 1980s. After Carter tried to push for it. Most modern feminists aren’t even aware that the draft is still a thing. Some claim that it doesn’t count because it was last used a long time ago, despite the fact that feminism cites historical oppression of women all the time.

    Also, many feminists seem to be men and women who used to be feminists. Then they actually started looking up the claims they were parroting, and then…

    Incidentally, Big Red, from other videos and her tumblr, has severe self-serving bias. She is incapable of admitting when she is wrong, even by accident, and has been known to contradict herself within minutes, or even seconds. IE “I love everyone! Fuck you!”

    Still, that article proves that even morons like Lindy West are starting to realize they can’t shut up MRAs and egalitarians, which is why they’re trying to control the debate and the perception of us. That article wasn’t actually intended for MRAs, it was intended for feminists. If West really wanted to communicate with MRAs, even her caricature of them, she wouldn’t start off telling them to shut up or feminists would hate them.

  7. Adam McPhee says:

    It’s not just the military either. I recall reading when I was in my early teens about police tests that required men to do 50 pushups in a minute to qualify and women to only do 30 in a minute (Not correct numbers, but it was a big disparity). I can recall thinking at the time, how is that equal? What if I had to do 100 push-ups to pass gym class and a girl only had to do 30?

    ***I’ll assume you meant “many interested in men’s issues” in your 3rd paragraph

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s